|
| |
TALLRITE BLOG
ARCHIVE
This archive contains all issues prior to the current week and the three
preceding weeks, which are published in
the main Tallrite Blog (www.tallrite.com/blog.htm).
The first issue appeared on Sunday 14th July
2002
You can write to blog@tallrite.com |
| JANUARY
2003 |
|
|
| |
|
ISSUE
#25 - 26th January 2003
[61]
|
|
Iraq's Apparatus
of Lies
Yet another Iraq dossier - the fourth - has just been
issued, this time by America. It's called "Apparatus
of Lies" and sets out in a dozen pages Saddam Hussein's
disinformation and propaganda over the period 1990 to 2003. With an
extensive bibliography and 31 references (most of them non-Governmental)
it makes for convincing reading. The dossier divides the behaviour
of Saddam and his regime into four categories.
 | Crafting Tragedy: Civilians are placed close to military
equipment, facilities and troops; military men and materiel are placed
next to or inside mosques and ancient cultural treasures. This
is to deter attack, yet in the event of attack, plenty of civilian
casualties and damage to the mosques and treasures will provide
propaganda points for the regime.
|
 | Exploiting Suffering: For this, Saddam
blames starvation and medical crises often of his own making
on the United Nations or the United States and its allies. This
includes
 |
blaming cancer and birth defects caused by Iraqi use of chemical
weapons at Halajba
on the US's depleted uranium shells from the Gulf War; |
 | blaming malnutrition and lack of medical facilities on sanctions
whereas there is plenty of money from the UN oil-for-food program
were it not diverted for new palaces ($2bn) and armaments; |
 | most
shockingly, dead babies are stored until sufficient are available to
stage mass funerals blaming the deaths on UN
sanctions.
|
|
 | Exploiting Islam: Despite being utterly non-religious, Saddam
adopts expressions of faith in his public pronouncements, and the
Iraqi propaganda apparatus erects billboards and distributes images
showing him praying or in other acts of piety. All the while,
the regime prevents pilgrims from making the Hajj or extorts money
from them for
the privilege.
|
 | Corrupting the Public Record: To corrupt the public record,
the regime uses a combination of on-the-record lies, covert placements
of false news accounts, self-inflicted damage, forgeries, and fake
interviews. |
Worth reading for the details.
And if you haven't already studied them or read my
earlier piece
and you have the stomach for it, the other three dossiers are :
 | Tony Blair's 55-page assessment
(427 kb) of Iraqs weapons of mass destruction
(WMD)
issued in September 2002, |
 | His 12-page report
(197 kb) on Saddams crimes and human rights abuses
issued in December 2002, and |
 | Saddam's massive dossier
comprising 529 megabytes, 11,900 pages issued in December 2002 in
response to a demand of UN
Resolution 1441. |
But
be quick, there's another one coming. Today's Sunday Telegraph leads
with : Blair demands new dossier to
drum up support for Iraq war.

Back
to Index
Material Breach
While we're on the subject, do you think the following
amount to a material
breach of said UN
Resolution 1441 ?
 | The UN inspectors have found 16 (albeit empty) chemical warheads
that were undeclared by Iraq. Meanwhile Iraq is silent about the other 29,984
from the 30,000 identified by the Inspectors in 1998 |
 | Other unaccounted-for materiel identified by the UN Inspectors in
1998 includes :
 | 550 artillery shells filled with mustard gas |
 | 400 biological weapons-capable aerial bombs |
 | 26,000 litres of anthrax |
 | Botulinum, VX, and Sarin gas |
|
 | New documents have been uncovered about Iraq's nuclear and missile programs |
 | Scientists are refusing to be interviewed without an Iraqi minder |
The inspectors are not in the country on a scavenger hunt for weapons. They
are there to confirm that Iraq has destroyed and dismantled the weapons
that the UN knows exist. In the absence of evidence that it has done
so, are we safe to assume that they have all disappeared ?
Certainly sounds like a material breach to me.

Back
to Index
Palestinians
Campaign for
Likud
Do the Palestinians have rocks in their heads or do they not want their
war with Israel to be replaced with a peace settlement ?
Israel's last four governments, each democratically
elected, have alternated between soft
and hard.
 | Labour (1995-96) under Shimon
Peres and dominated by so-called doves, eager to give the Oslo
peace process of 1993 a chance. |
 | Likud (1996-99) under hardliner Benjamin
Netanyahu, elected to teach the Palestinians a lesson for their
obduracy (as perceived by Israelis) over Oslo. |
 | Labour (1999-2001) under Ehud
Barak who under President Clinton's admirable sponsorship and
cajoling offered Yasser Arafat no less than 97% of the land he was
demanding for a Palestinian State, but Mr Arafat stalked off without a
single counter-proposal. |
 | Likud (2001 to the present) under ultra tough guy Ariel
Sharon in response to the Intifada and suicide bombings that
Yasser Arafat launched with weeks of walking out of Camp
David. |
Regardless of whether you support them, it is to Israel's considerable credit that it has a powerful democratic
system which, when confronted with failure, allows different approaches
and different leaders to be given a chance. Would that the
Palestinians were given such opportunity.
Nevertheless, the Palestinians are playing, as they always have done
and whether they like it or not, a
crucial rôle in influencing Israel's next choice of party and
leader.
 | They can continue to send suicide bombers and other attackers to
kill Israeli citizens. This will ensure that another Likud
hardliner will be elected - probably a re-run of Mr Sharon or Mr
Natanyahu. With such a renewed mandate, he will undoubtedly continue
responding with heavy military force to every attack, convinced that a
crushing military defeat is the only way to end further
bloodshed.
Or |
 | They can stop their attacks, which will result in a dove-ish leader
from Labour being elected. The consequence will be renewed
attempts to settle their differences through negotiation again rather
than guns. |
And which of the two parties are the Palestinians backing ?
The continuing attacks
over the past two weeks show they are voting convincingly for the hardline
Likud party.
At the same time the Palestinians are distracting
attention away from corruption
scandals involving Mr Sharon's son Omri and other party
members. They can't believe their luck.

Back
to Index
SimDesk
- Houston Replaces Microsoft Office
The US Department of Justice spent years dragging Microsoft through the
courts to prove it is a wicked monopolist and should therefore be broken
up. Although most of us might have thought the case was obvious,
Microsoft with its army of lawyers managed to slide out of it all with little
more than a slap on the wrist and the promise of better behaviour in the
future.
But if the DoJ were unable to tweak the tail of one of America's
mightiest corporations, the City of Houston in Texas has.
It all started after Microsoft threatened to audit Houston for
allegedly having more copies of Microsoft Office than they have licences
for, unless Houston signed a new three-year $12 million
contract.
This bully-boy approach has backfired badly.
According to USA
Today, it galvanised Houston to think of alternatives to Microsoft
Office. As a result of a chance meeting on an aircraft, Houston
has awarded a five-year $9˝m contract to an obscure, unproven
competitor called SimDesk, to
replace Microsoft Office on the desks of some 6,500 city workers and,
eventually, up to three million city residents.
It is true that SimDesk does not possess all the glorious (and about
90% unused) functionality of Microsoft Office, but it is apparently
perfectly adequate for the word processing and spreadsheeting that most
people require, and is easy to learn and use.
Meanwhile, not only is SimDesk way cheaper to buy, but It operates from
a central server rather than being installed on every PC. This means Houston don't have
to upgrade their existing
computers. Had they stuck to Microsoft, they would, in addition to
that $12m contract, have had to
replace thousands of computers to enable them to run Office
XP.
Microsoft, known by many as the
evil empire, are
whinging but seem powerless. Few are shedding
tears.

Back
to Index
Munster and Tough
Rugby
Saturday night a week ago, 18th January, the city of
Limerick in the Munster province of Ireland erupted in an all-night orgy
of revelry. Limerick is the heart of rugby in Ireland, and the
Munster rugby team, in their crummy home ground of Thomond
Park, had just pulled off an utterly impossible win against the
(hitherto) all-conquering English club, Gloucester in the annual Heineken
European Rugby Cup competition.
Having played in the semi-finals and/or finals of this prestigious
competition for the past three years, yet never won, Munster were on the
verge of being booted unceremoniously out of the competition. Their
only chance was to defeat Gloucester (who three months earlier had trounced
them 35-16) by no fewer than four tries and 27 points.
In an extraordinary match, that for Munstermen is
equalled only by the classic 12-0 defeat in 1978 of New Zealand's All
Blacks that has spawned an award-winning stage play, Alone
It Stands, Munster defeated Gloucester by the required margin, with
the winning two points coming only in the last seconds of injury
time. The final
score was 33-6 in front of a frenetic crowd of 14,000.
Gloucester just didn't know what had happened to them.
Then over the next couple of days, a curious story emerged.
Limerick taxi-driver and avid Munster fan Tom O'Donnell will
tell you he is small, fat, bald, 52 and now the toast of Limerick,
and considering launching himself on the after-dinner speaking
circuit.
The day before the match, he happened to carry in his taxi an official
of the Gloucester contingent, who committed the fatal mistake of leaving
behind in the car Gloucester's top-secret game-plan.
Tom realised what it was, but at first no-one would listen to
him. It was only with great difficulty that he managed to deliver it
to the Munster squad on the morning of the match. Thus it was that
Munster knew in advance
 | what Gloucester planned to do, |
 | what their lineout calls were, |
 | what were their plans of attack against Munster. |
This undoubtedly helped towards the win, though they will never admit
it.
In one of the many radio interviews that followed after the story
broke, Tom was asked whether he considered giving the game-plan back to
Gloucester rather than passing it to the opposition. A stunned
silence followed - he simply did not understand the question. It was
like expecting the British to return the Enigma machine to the
Nazis.
Gloucester have considered taking some kind of legal action, but,
frankly, they are just too embarrassed by everything to do with their
disastrous weekend in Limerick.
So that's the story of why Tom O'Donnell is the toast of Limerick !

Back
to Index
Flt Lt Henry Botterell, 1896-2003
Henry Botterell died
in Toronto earlier this month at the massive age of 106, the last
surviving fighter pilot of World War I.
Flying his Sopwith Camel biplane, his one
"kill" was to shoot down a German observation balloon in
Northern France in 1918, as illustrated in this
painting. By then he had crashed three planes, nearly
annihilating himself in the process.
As well as countless bombing raids (tossing bombs by hand out of the
cockpit) over the course of the four year war, he also participated in
seven dogfights, clocked up 251 combat hours and claimed he had also
killed an enemy observer. Every dogfight ended with bullet holes and
flak damage to his plane.
In those days, planes were made of wood and canvas and I am reminded of
how my own grandfather, eight years his senior, escaped from the trenches
and all the horror that they entailed. He was an upholsterer by
trade, and his possession of curved needles (seen as a novelty) coupled
with his skill in wielding them found him a ready home in the Royal Flying
Corps. He spent the rest of the war sewing up aircraft
battle-damaged like Flight Lieutenant Botterell's.
I wonder did they ever meet.

Back
to Index
|
| |
|
ISSUE
#24 - 19th January 2003
[60]
|
|
North Korea and Iraq
America and Britain are in the final stages of launching
their war against the Iraqi regime (with or without another UN resolution,
with or without further allies). Lots of people - besides Saddam -
object to this, though none ever come up with a coherent alternative strategy
for dealing with
 | this master despot, |
 | his weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and |
 | the need to neutralize the threat to the world that this
combination entails. |
Many whatabouters say
 |
why pick on Iraq which (as far as we know) doesn't yet have nuclear
weapons, |
 | and yet practice diplomacy with North Korea which
does ? |
 |
Moreover, neither of them are making deals with Al Qaeda. |
It doesn't make
sense, they claim.
In
fact it makes chillingly good sense. This table compares some of the
nasty qualities of Kim Jong Il's North Korea and Saddam Hussein's
Iraq.
|
|
N
Korea
|
Iraq
|
|
Possesses
Nuclear WMD
?
|
|
NO
|
|
Possesses
Chemical and Biological WMD ?
|
|
|
|
Has
used WMD
?
|
NO
|
|
|
Terrorises
own people
?
|
|

|
|
Has
invaded and/or threatened neighbours
?
|
|
|
|
Sells
weapons to other states
?
|
|
NO
|
|
Has
known terrorist connections ?
|
NO
|
NO
|
See how similar they are to each other. But a couple of
key contrasts and conclusions stand out.
 | Iraq has used his WMD with gusto (chemical attacks
killing some 4,000 of his own people at Halajba
in the 1980s) but doesn't yet have the bomb. North Korea's
position is the exact reverse.
 | Having seen the effectiveness of chemical weapons, it would be
very odd
 | if Saddam didn't hanker after a bomb of his own, or |
 | if
Kim Jong Il were to rule out the use of his own WMD - including
his bomb.
|
|
|
 | Though neither has links to international terrorists
at present, impoverished North Korea has been selling its weapons for
years (they're its only significant foreign currency earner).
Only last month it was caught sending a clandestine shipment
of Scud missiles to Yemen.
 | And if Kim Jong Il is so eager to sell his weapons, why would he
- and for that matter Saddam - refuse sales to international
terrorists such as Al Qaeda who have demonstrated their zeal for
mass murder ? |
|
North Korea thus provides the very reason to attack and disarm
Saddam. And NOW while it's still possible, before he
gets his bomb and starts using or selling it.
North Korea, because of its nuclear arsenal, is essentially
non-attackable.
But Kim Jong Il cannot help but notice and be influenced by a swift and
successful action to disarm Iraq, and thus to be more inclined to
negotiate a reasonable and verifiable stand-off arrangement with the rest
of the world.
In the early 1980s, the UK tried in vain to get China - then as now a
merciless communist dictatorship - to negotiate seriously about the future
of the British colony of Hong Kong whose lease would expire in 1997.
China was dismissive and said the Red Army would simply march in and take
over, and might not even wait until 1997.
Then in April 1982 the Argentine dictator General
Galtieri (who died
a few days ago) invaded the Malvinas/Falkland Islands, another British
colony. Margaret Thatcher, then the British Prime Minister, was
having none of it and sent a huge naval task force. After a short
war, it evicted the Argentines ignominiously. The war destroyed
Galtieri's career and paved the way to the restoration of democracy in
Argentina.
Meantime, China, never itself under any military threat
from Britain, took note of Mrs Thatcher's determined military
action. It concluded that it would be wiser to start being sensible
over Hong Kong, because you never knew what that mad woman might do
next. The result was a negotiated and peaceful settlement under Deng
Xiaopings
one
country two systems
philosophy.
So it will be with Kim Jong Il after Saddam has been disarmed and
eliminated. He will start being sensible.
The effect on other dictatorships in Arabia will likewise be
benign.
A reader with strong dissenting views writes There
are a dozen countries in Africa with regimes far worse than Mr. Sadam's
but nobody is talking about sorting them out cause
there's nothing in it for anybody apart from doing the MORAL thing.
It's no coincidence that a huge lump of the US arms industry is located
in Texas. War is GOOD for business.
Read the full letter on the Letters
page, together with a little song.

Back
to Index
Misdirected
Anti-War Protests
Meanwhile,
over the past few days we've seen anti-war
protests in New York, Washington, Bahrein, Berlin, Cairo,
Christchurch, Goteburg, Karachi, London, Moscow, Paris, Shannon,
Tokyo, and God knows where else.
But if the
protesters don't want war, why are they massing outside US embassies and
other US institutions ?
For it is not the
USA but Iraq, under the thumb of Saddam Hussein, who for more than a
decade has been violating binding UN resolutions - including agreements he
specifically signed up to as a condition of ending the 1991 Gulf
War. The upcoming Second Gulf War is the direct consequence if his violatory
actions and his alone.
So if the
peaceniks don't want war, it is to Iraqi embassies and institutions that
they should direct their rage. Otherwise, it means they support
Saddam's violations and regime. Not to mention his human rights
abuses so eloquently articulated in Tony Blair's graphic and
compelling dossier
(197 kb)

Back
to Index
Child
Pornography and Sentencing
On 8th September 1999, the FBI
raided the home of Thomas and Janice Reedy in Fort Worth, Texas and
found that the couple were providing child pornography to some 35,000
subscribers in the US. On further investigation under the code name
Operation Avalanche, it emerged that they were in fact
 |
operating a global
network of 5,700 sites |
 |
with an astonishing 250,000 subscribers
and |
 |
grossing
some $1.4m per month. |
The FBI set about identifying the US and
foreign subscribers from their credit card details, which they then passed
to police forces in the subscribers' countries of residence. These
included 7,000
in the UK and some hundreds in Ireland.
In Ireland, over 100 homes were raided
simultaneously last May, including those of a barrister, a choirmaster, a
solicitor, a health authority official, a teacher, a circuit court judge
and a celebrity TV chef.
The first two trials were set for last week, and out of a
possible 100 defendants it is odd that two
high-profile individuals were selected, the judge and the chef.
The circuit court judge obtained a three month deferment on the grounds
of ill-health (though was later spotted drinking a pint in a pub).
The celebrity TV chef, Tim
Allen, is widely known throughout the country, as are his mother and
his wife both also celebrity TV chefs. He pleaded guilty to
possession of 92 child pornography images and was convicted.
However his non-custodial sentence of a 40,000
donation to charity and 240 hours of community service has provoked
outrage due to the leniency and the perceived ability of the wealthy to
buy themselves out of trouble.
But more pernicious is the precedent it
sets for the future prosecutions. Because when a man of lesser means
is threatened with jail, he is bound to plead that this is only due to his
lack of wealth and fame. Moreover, if a millionaire is fined
40,000, his own fine should be proportionately less.
The mismanagement of the Tim Allen case may thus, in
Ireland, devalue the severity of child pornography into a mere misdemeanour.
The Americans understand the gravity of this foulest of
crimes far
better. Thomas Reedy is currently serving a prison sentence of 1,335 years.
Not days. Years.

Back
to Index
African Financial Scams
In common, I imagine, with most of you, I receive on a weekly basis one
or more e-mails from a stranger saying he (or sometimes she) is a Nigerian
or Cameroonian or Ghanaian or Angolan or Congolese or from some other African
country. He is either a senior functionary in the Finance Ministry
or else the close relative of a departed despot (such as Sani Abacha or
Laurent Kabila). He has gained access to a huge sum of money (up to
$60m) and would I please provide a safe haven for it in return for
30%. All I have to do is provide my bank details.
This is known as the 419
Fraud, after the relevant section of the Nigerian Criminal
Code.
If you don't want your bank account plundered or Nigerian arrest
warrants issued or countless other interesting developments in your life,
the only response is to hit the Delete button -
pronto.
Have a look at this excellent fraud
alert issued by London's Metropolitan Police Force, which provides
full details about the 419.

Back
to Index
Such Is Youth
What did you do when you were 16 years old and for the next five
years ?
 | Did you, for example, run away from home, then change bank-code
numbers so that people's bank-deposits went into your account instead
of theirs ? |
 | Did you dress up as an airline pilot so as to fly free on the jump
seat, pull the chicks and stay free in hotels ? |
 | Did you forge credentials so as to relieve people of money by posing
as a senior lawyer, a professor, a doctor ? |
 | Did you cash counterfeit cheques across the US, France and Sweden
and become notorious in 26 countries ? |
 | Did you in the process accumulate ill-gotten gains of $2.5m by the
time you were 21 ? |
No, nor did I. I was a pretty boring youth compared with
handsome, charismatic Frank Abagnale from New York.
Sadly, the law eventually caught up with him and he was sentenced to
twelve years in the slammer.
But after only five years he struck his cleverest deal
of all. The FBI, realising his expertise in embezzlement and
swindling, freed him in return for help to catch other con-men. And
he wrote his life-story, Catch
Me If You Can, suitably embellished (as you would expect) to make it
even more dashing and glamorous.
From there he went on to become a suave consultant
assisting major companies to thwart all kinds of fraud.
A pillar of society, Frank is now a 54-year-old family
man, and professes to be embarrassed that Hollywood have made a movie
of his life (though being played by that girlie Leonardo
di Caprio is enough to embarrass anyone).
A role model for all.

Back
to Index
Computer
Hardware Problem
The
phone rings:
 | Tech
Support: Hello, Computer Tech Support here.
|
 | Customer:
Hello. My computer was making a strange hissing noise last
night and this morning when I turned it on there was a crackling noise
and some smoke then nothing. If I bring it in can you fix it ? |
Take
a look at the pictures
..... you won't believe it.

Back
to Index
|
| |
|
ISSUE #23 - 12th January 2003
[58]
|
| Afghanistan
One Year On
The
new transitional Afghan government under the charismatic, English-speaking
President Karzai has been in power for scarcely a year.
It was inaugurated via a Loya Jirga, which is a traditional
Afghan consultative assembly in which all shades of opinion (bar the
ousted Talibans !) was heard. Short
of the pan-Afghanistan elections planned
for late 2003 the assembly represents the closest thing to
democracy the country has ever seen.
No
longer hitting every days headlines, the country has quietly been undergoing an
encouraging transformation and reconstruction, thanks to the financial and
other support of some sixty nations, with the US as the biggest single
donor. In a dramatic vote
of confidence in the future, over two million Afghan refugees have
returned to Afghanistan to remake their lives.
Its
worth recounting some of the achievements.
Last
month, Afghanistan and six
neighbouring countries signed the Kabul Declaration on Good Neighborly
Relations. This is a pledge to respect Afghanistans independence and
territorial integrity, to offer co-operation, non-interference and
goodwill vital pre-conditions for future domestic security.
Meanwhile,
there have been :
 |
6,100
water projects completed |
 |
72
health clinics, birth centres and hospitals rebuilt, |
 |
four
mountain passes re-opened, including (for $5˝m) the Salang Tunnel
which is vital for north-south commerce during the winter, |
 |
31
bridges reconstructed, |
 | 4,000
kilometers of road rebuilt, |
 | 142 schools, daycare centers and vocational schools rebuilt, |
 | an 843,000-ton increase
(82%) in the harvest, |
 |
200
small-scale reconstruction projects completed, such as
 |
a
girls school in Mazar-e-Sharif, |
 |
the
heating system for one of the ministries |
 |
hospital generators in Kandahar in one of the big
hospitals that had no heat and no electricity.
|
|
In
the 15 months since the 9/11 atrocity, the UNHCR has spent $848m
on on humanitarian relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction, including
$100m in food aid and $140m for resettling the 2m
returning refugees.
This information comes from a
press release last month by Philip Reeker of the US State Department and a
press conference with Andrew Natsios of USAID.
Not only is all this
extremely encouraging in its own right, but it give the lie to those
who said war against the Taliban in Afghanistan would ravage the
country for decades. The reverse is true. It is the war
that has liberated the Afghan people and enabled reconstruction to
race ahead.
The same naysayers are
making the same claims in respect of the coming war to remove the
Saddam regime from the Iraq it has systematically tortured, devasted
and disgraced over the past 20 years. They
will similarly be proved wrong.
As will their underlying preference to
leave Saddam in place to do his worst rather than remove him.

Back
to Index
Ireland - Europe's Refugee Haven
The Geneva Convention states that a refugee is someone with
a well-founded fear of persecution.
However, Ireland's asylum-seekers all arrive after departing from mainland Europe or
Britain, where there is no persecution. They are therefore not
refugees; they are illegal immigrants.
Further, Rudd Lubber, the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees, advocates
one
refugee per 1,000 citizens for the host country, which he believes would eliminate Europe's refugee problem. In 2002 Ireland had
four asylum-seekers per 1,000 citizens, compared with only 1.2 in
Britain. Just two years ago, the figures were
0.7 and 2.9 respectively, demonstrating how popular Ireland has
become.
Meanwhile, to support illegal immigrants who should not be there, Ireland is
spending 300
million per annum. This is being paid not by society's wealthy, but by
those being deprived of its use - the homeless and thousands on housing
waiting lists. Ireland's homelessness problem would be solved with
just 40 million given to the charity groups established for that
purpose. That would still leave 260 million, enough to build
2,000 social houses per annum.
A significant indirect cost, among many, is the way rents have grown
due to the increased demand from illegal immigrants who are are competing
with the poorest in society for the available space.
Why do these illegal immigrants leave France, Germany, Holland,
Britain, etc, and come to a wet windswept island on the western fringe of
Europe, in unprecedented numbers ?
Simply, because it is by far the best deal in Europe.
Ireland contributes to the problem by having no coherent strategy for
managing legal immigration. What it badly needs is a joined-up
immigration policy, that
 | recognizes the country's need for immigrants to fill particular
jobs, both at the high and the low ends of the scale, |
 | assesses the desirability of admitting
particular individuals to fill these jobs (like, for example, Australia
and Canada do) and |
 | implements a process for issuing work and residence permits (US
green card equivalents) which
welcome them to move here legally for pre-agreed periods. |
But meanwhile, at least there is no tunnel under the Irish Sea for them
to pour through.

Back
to Index
Bush's Undemocratic
Election
As we all well remember, Republican
George W Bush became the US's 43rd president only after a nail-biting
election. The count was so close in the crucial swing state of
Florida, that it took six weeks before the US Supreme Court
forbade further recounts and declared W as the winner. The
favourite, Democrat Vice President Al Gore, had
lost.
The final
tally was
 | Bush 50.4m votes, 49.4% |
 | Gore 51.0m votes, 50.4% |
Democrats were understandably outraged,
since Gore won more votes than W. To this day, many of them still
complain that Bush is an illegitimate leader. They are joined by
left-liberals in the US and abroad who abhor Bush's policy (and
success) in tackling world terrorism, some even saying that his
elevation to power is as undemocratic as Saddam's.
But this is to misunderstand the underlying
philosophy of the American presidential election system. It uses an
electoral college
(EC) whereby each US State has a certain number
of electoral college votes depending on its geographical size, population,
history and other factors. For example,
| |